Yahoo’s anti-SPAM email move

MyWay has this link to a Reuter’s article about Yahoo’s newest anti-SPAM move. It allows a premium mail subscriber to create a “base name” and up to 500 variations. The user can create a “new” email address and give it out to whomever they like. If SPAM starts to show up, that one account can be shut down. This is similar to services like Mailshell and SpamGourmet and, when coupled with other anti-SPAM measures like Bayesian filters, can provide the most SPAM-free solution. I never give out my true email address except to people I trust — every other email address is one of my “traps”.

Yahoo’s anti-SPAM email move Read More »

PCMag.com’s 101 “most useful sites”

I put that in quotes because, well, as they say: YMMV (“your mileage may vary”). The article has them broken up into classes like Computing-Everyone, Computing-Experts, Shopping and Information. They’ve also got them all combined into a zip file that you can download and add to your Favorites folder.

Not a lot of surprises here … i mean their number one shopping site is Amazon.com, but, still, it’s nice having them organized in that way.

PCMag.com’s 101 “most useful sites” Read More »

Google tips : syntax pointers and even search paper catalogs

PCMag.com has this great article of Google tips. It contains pointers to syntax help on the Google site as well as some things I didn’t knew were available like being able to search paper catalogs like, oh, heck, Williams-Sonoma, West Marine and Land’s End.

I didn’t know Google maintained this list of tools and services before I read the article. Good info.

Google tips : syntax pointers and even search paper catalogs Read More »

Do-Not-Call list has a web bug

TechTV reports that the Do-Not-Call list web page, hosted by AT&T, has a web bug on it that could relate the individual signing up on the page to an IP address if the right reports are run. Now, I haven’t given this a lot of thought (yet) but it doesn’t seem to me like this is much of an exposure, is it? I mean, by virtue of going to the web page, doesn’t AT&T already have everything that the web bug will give them? If AT&T is already hosting and managing the FTC’s servers and has sufficient access and rights to put the web bug there in the first place, they certainly have access to all the userinformation. And I can understand, having been in the business for a while, that the web bug would allow AT&T to monitor performance. Still, it seems a little odd.

I think this is probably more a matter of insufficient thought being given to an ordinary business practice.

Do-Not-Call list has a web bug Read More »